You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
311 lines
14 KiB
311 lines
14 KiB
Release 3.0.0, April 8th 2014 |
|
----------------------------- |
|
|
|
The ardupilot development team is proud to announce the release of |
|
version 3.0.0 of APM:Plane. This is a major release with a lot of new |
|
features. |
|
|
|
For each release I try to highlight the two or 3 key new features that |
|
have gone in since the last release. That is a more difficult task |
|
this time around because there are just so many new things. Still, I |
|
think the most important ones are the new Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) |
|
for attitude/position estimation, the extensive dual sensors support |
|
and the new AP_Mission library. |
|
|
|
We have also managed to still keep support for the APM1 and APM2, |
|
although quite a few of the new features are not available on those |
|
boards. We don't yet know for how long we'll be able to keep going on |
|
supporting these old boards, so if you are thinking of getting a new |
|
board then you should get a Pixhawk, and if you want the best |
|
performance from the APM:Plane code then you should swap to a |
|
Pixhawk now. It really is a big improvement. |
|
|
|
New Extended Kalman Filter |
|
-------------------------- |
|
|
|
The biggest change for the 3.0.0 release (and in fact the major reason |
|
why we are calling it 3.0.0) is the new Extended Kalman Filter from |
|
Paul Riseborough. Using an EKF for attitude and position estimation |
|
was never an option on the APM2 as it didn't have the CPU power or |
|
memory to handle it. The Pixhawk does have plenty of floating point |
|
performance, and Paul has done a fantastic job of taking full |
|
advantage of the faster board. |
|
|
|
As this is the first stable release with the EKF code we have decided |
|
to not enable it by default. It does however run all the time in |
|
parallel with the existing DCM code, and both attitude/position |
|
solutions are logged both to the on-board SD card and over |
|
MAVLink. You can enable the EKF code using the parameter |
|
AHRS_EKF_USE=1, which can be set and unset while flying, allowing you |
|
to experiment with using the EKF either by examining your logs with |
|
the EKF disabled to see how it would have done or by enabling it while |
|
flying. |
|
|
|
The main thing you will notice with the EKF enabled is more accurate |
|
attitude estimation and better handling of sensor glitches. A Kalman |
|
filter has an internal estimate of the reliability of each of its |
|
sensor inputs, and is able to weight them accordingly. This means that |
|
if your accelerometers start giving data that is inconsistent with |
|
your other sensors then it can cope in a much more graceful way than |
|
our old DCM code. |
|
|
|
The result is more accurate flying, particularly in turns. It also |
|
makes it possible to use higher tuning gains, as the increased |
|
accuracy of the attitude estimation means that you can push the |
|
airframe harder without it becoming unstable. You may find you can use |
|
a smaller value for NAVL1_PERIOD, giving tighter turns, and higher |
|
gains on your roll and pitch attitude controllers. |
|
|
|
Paul has written up a more technical description of the new EKF code |
|
here: |
|
|
|
http://plane.ardupilot.com/wiki/common-apm-navigation-extended-kalman-filter-overview/ |
|
|
|
|
|
Dual Sensors |
|
------------ |
|
|
|
The second really big change for this release is support for |
|
dual-sensors. We now take full advantage of the dual accelerometers |
|
and dual gyros in the Pixhawk, and can use dual-GPS for GPS |
|
failover. We already had dual compass support, so the only main |
|
sensors we don't support two of now are the barometer and the airspeed |
|
sensor. I fully expect we will support dual baro and dual airspeed in |
|
a future release. |
|
|
|
You might wonder why dual sensors is useful, so let me give you an |
|
example. I fly a lot of nitro and petrol planes, and one of my planes |
|
(a BigStik 60) had a strange problem where it would be flying |
|
perfectly in AUTO mode, then when the throttle reached a very specific |
|
level the pitch solution would go crazy (sometimes off by 90 |
|
degrees). I managed to recover in MANUAL each time, but it certainly |
|
was exciting! |
|
|
|
A careful analysis of the logs showed that the culprit was |
|
accelerometer aliasing. At a very specific throttle level the Z |
|
accelerometer got a DC offset of 11 m/s/s. So when the plane was |
|
flying along nice and level the Z accelerometer would change from -10 |
|
m/s/s to +1 m/s/s. That resulted in massive errors in the attitude |
|
solution. |
|
|
|
This sort of error happens because of the way the accelerometer is |
|
sampled. In the APM code the MPU6000 (used on both the APM2 and |
|
Pixhawk) samples the acceleration at 1kHz. So if you have a strong |
|
vibrational mode that is right on 1kHz then you are sampling the "top |
|
of the sine wave", and get a DC offset. |
|
|
|
The normal way to fix this issue is to improve the physical |
|
anti-vibration mounting in the aircraft, but I don't like to fix |
|
problems like this by making changes to my aircraft, as if I fix my |
|
aircraft it does nothing for the thousands of other people running the |
|
same code. As the lead APM developer I instead like to fix things in |
|
software, so that everyone benefits. |
|
|
|
The solution was to take advantage of the fact that the Pixhawk has |
|
two accelerometers, one is a MPU6000, and the 2nd is a LSM303D. The |
|
LSM303D is sampled at 800Hz, whereas the MPU6000 is sampled at |
|
1kHz. It would be extremely unusual to have a vibration mode with |
|
aliasing at both frequencies at once, which means that all we needed |
|
to do was work out which accelerometer is accurate at any point in |
|
time. For the DCM code that involved matching each accelerometer at |
|
each time step to the combination of the GPS velocity vector and |
|
current attitude, and for the EKF it was a matter of producing a |
|
weighting for the two accelerometers based on the covariance matrix. |
|
|
|
The result is that the plane flew perfectly with the new dual |
|
accelerometer code, automatically switching between accelerometers as |
|
aliasing occurred. |
|
|
|
Since adding that code I have been on the lookout for signs of |
|
aliasing in other logs that people send me, and it looks like it is |
|
more common than we expected. It is rarely so dramatic as seen on my |
|
BigStik, but often results in some pitch error in turns. I am hopeful |
|
that with a Pixhawk and the 3.0 release of APM:Plane that these types |
|
of problems will now be greatly reduced. |
|
|
|
For the dual gyro support we went with a much simpler solution and |
|
just average the two gyros when both are healthy. That reduces noise, |
|
and works well, but doesn't produce the dramatic improvements that the |
|
dual accelerometer code resulted in. |
|
|
|
Dual GPS was also quite a large development effort. We now support |
|
connecting a 2nd GPS to the serial4/5 port on the Pixhawk. This allows |
|
you to protect against GPS glitches, and has also allowed us to get a |
|
lot of logs showing that even with two identical GPS modules it is |
|
quite common for one of the GPS modules to get a significant error |
|
during a flight. The new code currently switches between the two GPS |
|
modules based on the lock status and number of satellites, but we are |
|
working on a more sophisticated switching mechanism. |
|
|
|
Supporting dual GPS has also made it easier to test new GPS |
|
modules. This has enabled us to do more direct comparisons between the |
|
Lea6 and the Neo7 for example, and found the Neo7 performs very |
|
well. It also helps with developing completely new GPS drivers, such |
|
as the Piksi driver (see notes below). |
|
|
|
New AP_Mission library |
|
---------------------- |
|
|
|
Many months ago Brandon Jones re-worked our mission handling code to |
|
be a library, making it much cleaner and fixing a number of long term |
|
annoyances with the behaviour. For this release Randy built upon the |
|
work that Brandon did and created the new AP_Mission library. |
|
|
|
The main feature of this library from the point of view of the |
|
developers is that it has a much cleaner interface, but it also has |
|
some new user-visible features. The one that many users will be glad |
|
to hear is that it no longer needs a "dummy waypoint" after a |
|
jump. That was always an annoyance when creating complex missions. |
|
|
|
The real advantage of AP_Mission will come in future releases though, |
|
as it has the ability to look ahead in the mission to see what is |
|
coming, allowing for more sophisticated navigation. The copter code |
|
already takes advantage of this with the new spline waypoint feature, |
|
and we expect to take similar advantage of this in APM:Plane in future |
|
releases. |
|
|
|
New Piksi GPS driver |
|
-------------------- |
|
|
|
One of the most exciting things to happen in the world of GPS modules |
|
in the last couple of years is the announcement by SwiftNav that they |
|
would be producing a RTK capable GPS module called the Piksi at a |
|
price that (while certainly expensive!) is within reach of more |
|
dedicated hobbyists. It offers the possibility of decimeter and |
|
possibly even centimetre level relative positioning, which has a lot |
|
of potential for small aircraft, particularly for landing control and |
|
more precise aerial mapping. |
|
|
|
This release of APM:Plane has the first driver for the Piksi. The new |
|
driver is written by Niels Joubert, and he has done a great job. It is |
|
only a start though, as this is a single point positioning driver. It |
|
will allow you to use your new Piksi if you were part of the |
|
kickstarter, but it doesn't yet let you use it in RTK mode. Niels and |
|
the SwiftNav team are working on a full RTK driver which we hope will |
|
be in the next release. |
|
|
|
Support for more RC channels |
|
---------------------------- |
|
|
|
This release is the first to allow use of more than 8 RC input |
|
channels. We now support up to 18 input channels on SBus on Pixhawk, |
|
with up to 14 of them able to be assigned to functions using the |
|
RCn_FUNCTION settings. For my own flying I now use a FrSky Taranis |
|
with X8R and X6R receivers and they work very nicely. Many thanks to |
|
the PX4 team, and especially to Holger and Lorenz for their great work |
|
on improving the SBus code. |
|
|
|
Flaperon Support |
|
---------------- |
|
|
|
This release is the first to have integrated flaperon support, and |
|
also includes much improved flaps support in general. You can now set |
|
a FLAP_IN_CHANNEL parameter to give an RC channel for manual flap |
|
control, and setup a FLAPERON_OUTPUT to allow you to setup your |
|
ailerons for both manual and automatic flaperon control. |
|
|
|
We don't yet have a full wiki page on setting up flaperons, but you |
|
can read about the parameters here: |
|
|
|
http://plane.ardupilot.com/wiki/arduplane-parameters/#Flap_input_channel_ArduPlaneFLAP_IN_CHANNEL |
|
|
|
Geofence improvements |
|
--------------------- |
|
|
|
Michael Day has made an number of significant improvements to the |
|
geo-fencing support for this release. It is now possible to |
|
enable/disable the geofence via MAVLink, allowing ground stations to |
|
control the fence. |
|
|
|
There are also three new fence control parameters. One is |
|
FENCE_RET_RALLY which when enabled tells APM to fly back to the |
|
closest rally point on a fence breach, instead of flying to the center |
|
of the fence area. That can be very useful for more precise control of |
|
fence breach handling. |
|
|
|
The second new parameter is FENCE_AUTOENABLE, which allows you to |
|
automatically enable a geofence on takeoff, and disable when doing an |
|
automatic landing. That is very useful for fully automated missions. |
|
|
|
The third new geofence parameter is FENCE_RETALT, which allows you to |
|
specify a return altitude on fence breach. This can be used to |
|
override the default (half way between min and max fence altitude). |
|
|
|
Automatic Landing improvements |
|
------------------------------ |
|
|
|
Michael has also been busy on the automatic landing code, with |
|
improvements to the TECS speed/height control when landing and new |
|
TECS_LAND_ARSPD and TECS_LAND_THR parameters to control airspeed and |
|
throttle when landing. This is much simpler to setup than |
|
DO_CHANGE_SPEED commands in a mission. |
|
|
|
Michael is also working on automatic path planning for landing, based |
|
on the rally points code. We hope that will get into a release soon. |
|
|
|
Detailed Pixhawk Power Logging |
|
------------------------------ |
|
|
|
One of the most common causes of issues with autopilots is power |
|
handling, with poor power supplies leading to brownouts or sensor |
|
malfunction. For this release we have enabled detailed logging of the |
|
information available from the on-board power management system of the |
|
Pixhawk, allowing us to log the status of 3 different power sources |
|
(brick input, servo rail and USB) and log the voltage level of the |
|
servo rail separately from the 5v peripheral rail on the FMU. |
|
|
|
This new logging should make it much easier for us to diagnose power |
|
issues that users may run into. |
|
|
|
New SERIAL_CONTROL protocol |
|
--------------------------- |
|
|
|
This release adds a new SERIAL_CONTROL MAVLink message which makes it |
|
possible to remotely control a serial port on a Pixhawk from a ground |
|
station. This makes it possible to do things like upgrade the firmware |
|
on a 3DR radio without removing it from an aircraft, and will also |
|
make it possible to attach to and control a GPS without removing it |
|
from the plane. |
|
|
|
There is still work to be done in the ground station code to take full |
|
advantage of this new feature and we hope to provide documentation |
|
soon on how to use u-Blox uCenter to talk to and configure a GPS in an |
|
aircraft and to offer an easy 3DR radio upgrade button via the Pixhawk |
|
USB port. |
|
|
|
Lots of other changes! |
|
---------------------- |
|
|
|
There have been a lot of other improvements in the code, but to stop |
|
this turning into a book instead of a set of release notes I'll stop |
|
the detailed description there. Instead here is a list of the more |
|
important changes not mentioned above: |
|
|
|
- added LOG_WHEN_DISARMED flag in LOG_BITMASK |
|
- raised default LIM_PITCH_MAX to 20 degrees |
|
- support a separate steering channel from the rudder channel |
|
- faster mission upload on USB |
|
- new mavlink API for reduced memory usage |
|
- fixes for the APM_OBC Outback Challenge module |
|
- fixed accelerometer launch detection with no airspeed sensor |
|
- greatly improved UART flow control on Pixhawk |
|
- added BRD_SAFETYENABLE option to auto-enable the safety |
|
switch on PX4 and Pixhawk on boot |
|
- fixed pitot tube ordering bug and added ARSPD_TUBE_ORDER parameter |
|
- fixed log corruption bug on PX4 and Pixhawk |
|
- fixed repeated log download bug on PX4 and Pixhawk |
|
- new Replay tool for detailed log replay and analysis |
|
- flymaple updates from Mike McCauley |
|
- fixed zero logs display in MAVLink log download |
|
- fixed norm_input for cruise mode attitude control |
|
- added RADIO_STATUS logging in aircraft logs |
|
- added UBX monitor messages for detailed hardware logging of u-Blox status |
|
- added MS4525 I2C airspeed sensor voltage compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
I hope that everyone enjoys flying this new APM:Plane release as much |
|
as we enjoyed producing it! It is a major milestone in the development |
|
of the fixed wing code for APM, and I think puts us in a great |
|
position for future development. |
|
|
|
Happy flying!
|
|
|