because we need to have SITL simulation as realistic as possible
compared to a real flight with default settings such that we
either fix the problems or adjust the defaults already in SITL testing.
- avoids the need for ekf2_timestamp publications by q and lpe
- adds logger to the lockstep cycle and makes it poll on ekf2_timestamps
or vehicle_attitude. This avoids dropped samples (required for replay).
- IMU integration move from drivers (PX4Accelerometer/PX4Gyroscope) to sensors/vehicle_imu
- sensors: voted_sensors_update now consumes vehicle_imu
- delete sensor_accel_integrated, sensor_gyro_integrated
- merge sensor_accel_status/sensor_gyro_status into vehicle_imu_status
- sensors status output minor improvements (ordering, whitespace, show selected sensor device id and instance)
Before #14212 the velocity control gains used in the multicopter
position controller were defined as a scale between velocity error in
one axis (or it's integral and derivative respectively) and the unit
thrust vector. The problem with this is that the normalization of the
unit thrust vector changes per vehicle or even vehicle configuration
as 0 and 100% thrust get a different physical response. That's why
the gains are now defined as scale between velocity error
(integral/derivative) and the output acceleration in m/s².
- skip avionics rail voltage check when USB connected
- skip forced reboot on USB disconnect if circuit breaker set
- avionics voltage preflight check don't silently fail if system_power unavailble
- explicitly set supply check circuit breaker (CBRK_SUPPLY_CHK)
This adds a sitl target and aiframe configs for the r1_rover, which is a differential rover example for SITL rover. The model is based on the aion robotics r1 rover
Only have it higher for VTOL and fixed wing.
Multicopter position controlled flight is in our experience always <1g.
Acrobatic flying definitely exceeds the acceleration but if control
doesn't rely on the GPS velocity and position there shouldn't be any
problem.
-decrease L1 period for tighter mission tracking in fw mode
- increase backtransition duration, we can now do this is we have active
deceleration control
Signed-off-by: RomanBapst <bapstroman@gmail.com>
@fury1895 reported very valuable feedback from testing
the acceleration feed-forward on VTOL:
> MPC_JERK_MAX 4.5 (from 5 on it felt too aggressive)
> MPC_JERK_AUTO 4
> some hovering, some transitions, and a mission. Everything good.
> I'd say you feel the difference in position mode and you see it in
> Auto modes. Great improvement!
Matthias Grob
Stone White
Benjamin Perseghetti
Daniel Agar
Beat Küng
Lum
TSC21
JaeyoungLim
斯东Stone
kritz
JaeyoungLim
baumanta
Jakub Kákona
Hamish Willee
flbernier
mcsauder
Nico van Duijn
AlexKlimaj
Julian Oes
RomanBapst